Tax Blog

Home / Archive by category "Tax Blog" (Page 2)
Buying a holiday home abroad – the tax issues

Buying a holiday home abroad – the tax issues

Here's a video Felicity and I filmed in Umbria, with the help of a friendly black cat with very sharp claws.

The video looks into your responsibilites around tax if you buy a property abroad, and the extra things you have to do if you let it out, even a little.

http://youtu.be/6j2G7MPu17w

The video touches on UK income tax, Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and Inheritance Tax, as well as claiming foreign tax credit against your UK bill.

10 step guide to fraud protection

10 step guide to fraud protection

10 step guide to fraud protection

I recently met convicted fraudster Elliot Castro at a fascinating event run by the Northern Ireland Fraud Academy. Suppress that yawn – having a convicted fraudster on the platform answering our questions was far from dull.

The book of his life of crime (before he went to jail) is a good read. “Other People’s Money: The Rise and Fall of Britain’s Boldest Credit Card Fraudster” was written by Neil Forsyth & Elliot Castro.

Just like the wonderful Leonardo DiCaprio film about the real life con-man (“Catch me if you can”) Scottish Elliot Castro travelled the World on £2 million of other people’s money. In Elliot’s case credit card details obtained in a number of ways. Also on the platform were Jonathan Wilson, Head of Special Investigations at the bank AIB plc, and Charlie McMurdie – the woman who was until recently the Met’s Head of Cyber Crime. So we had former fraudster, victim and enforcer all there together.

Inspired by the talk, and aware from clients and daily professional life how easy it is to be conned, I have pulled together my top ten tips to help keep you safe from fraud. Further detail on each is after number 10.

  1. Don’t regard a high credit limit on your card as a badge of honour.
  2. Be careful what you share on social media.
  3. Your friend is NOT stranded abroad in need of your help
  4. When someone rings you, how do you know who they are?
  5. Phishing – be very careful what links you click in emails
  6. Online purchases – use just one card
  7. If someone phones you and says there is a problem with your card – they may be a crook.
  8. Online shopping in public wifi zones is risky.
  9. Make a bit more effort with passwords
  10. Be less trusting

Now I will go into why I gave these 10 tips.

 

  1. Don’t regard a high credit limit on your card as a badge of honour. If the limit is £10,000 and you never go over £2,000, then ask your card company to reduce your card limit. I do this. That way if a crook tries to book a business class flight to Cape Town costing £3,500 the purchase will fail.
  2. Be careful what you share on social media. I knew posting that I am on holiday could let burglars know to call at my house. What I didn’t think of was that Elliot Castro would use these times to phone your office and speak to a PA or colleague and persuade them to give him some useful information, like a mobile phone number etc.
  3. Your friend is NOT stranded abroad in need of your help. If you get an email from a known contact saying they are in some far-flung place stuck with no money for an emergency operation/ flight home/ hotel bill, its 99.9% sure to be fake. I get one of these every month or so ‘from’ a friend or client.       Nearly always they have had their BT email address hacked. Having a BT email myself I see regular things popping up on my phone or in emails tempting me to log in. Don’t do it. Once they have your email and password they can hack your email. And if you use part of that password in other sites your whole online life may be upset.
  4. When someone rings you, how do you know who they are? Just because they say they are from your bank, don’t divulge to them any of your security details. For example if they ask for letters 1 and 3 of your password, then in a month’s time ring and ask for letters 2 and 4…you can see how they could build up a picture! Elliot would sometimes work for weeks on a person’s case before he actually tried to use their money. If someone is from your bank you should be able to ring back on their published phone number (not the one the person gives you!) and speak to someone.
  5. Phishing – be very careful what links you click in emails. These emails are getting very sophisticated. For example HMRC will NEVER email you about a tax refund or tax bill to be paid. It is easy to be drawn into clicking a link and ending up in a fake website where you then put in your banking details, and overnight become very poor.       Always go to your online bank by either following a ‘bookmark’ on your computer or typing from fresh the web address you already know. Those extra seconds could save you a fortune.
  6. Online purchases – use just one card. The ex-detective advised that you keep just one credit card which you use for online purchases. Don’t use the others. Maybe also keep a low but suitable credit limit on it.
  7. If someone phones you (say when you are in your hotel room) and says there is a problem with your card – they may be a crook. This was one of Elliot Castro’s techniques. Ring up and say the card they checked in with has a problem, and Bingo – the guest gives you all their card details!
  8. Online shopping in public wifi zones is risky. The ex-detective warned that you could be attached to a proxy wifi-zone. In other words it looks legit but is taking a note as you browse of all your log-ins, passwords and card details – perhaps while you buy that fraud book by Elliot Castro on Amazon!.
  9. Make a bit more effort with passwords. Put an odd character in the middle. Instead of piggy1474runs try pi6%ggy1474runs. Avoid using things people might find like your date of birth, your child’s name or your current pet. (Imagine the Facebook post – ‘look here’s a snap of wee Spot after he came back neutered & sad from the vet.’ Crook guesses password Spot2013 )
  10. Be less trusting. Just because you hear a call centre in the background, it might just be a recording. If the girl calling you interrupts to ask her ‘colleague’ to “Get the porter to collect those bags” this does not confirm the girl works in your hotel. It just makes the call to you sound legit!

And finally I am sure you are wondering why Elliot Castro flew back to Belfast (where he once lived) to talk about his life before jail. The answer is that he has turned his life around and now advises the police and lots of blue-chip companies about how businesses can beef up their security and prevent the fraudster making off their or their customers’ money. I wish him all the best – we need his help.

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or 028 9080 6080.

Affected by DATS / Diss Accounting and Taxation Services (European) Ltd closure / BMST?

Are you affected by DATS / Diss Accounting and Taxation Services (European) Ltd /BMST?

 

A lot of people have been shocked in the last few days receiving a letter saying that Diss Accounting and Taxation Services (European) Ltd is closing on 31 October 2013. The clients are told that from 1 November 2013 the firm (sometimes known as DATS) will no longer act as their accountants.

I would expect this sad news is related to the HMRC attention on the tax-avoidance arrangements knows as BMST – Bridgham Managed Service Trust. A lot of people who used this scheme were introduced to it by the late Fred Robertson of this accountancy firm. The letter is signed by or on behalf of Catriona Robertson the director.

I go into more detail on BMST in the following article also on this website under Our Blog.

http://www.huston.co.uk/blog/191-hmrc-sets-bmst-deadline-of-30-nov-2013-tax-avoidance.html

VIDEO about BMST – see http://youtu.be/q2_MpwCCFO0

 

DATS / Diss Accounting and Taxation Services (European) Ltd

This business closing on 31 October 2013 is sad news for those involved and no doubt there are sound business reasons for taking the difficult decision.

The clients coming to me having used BMST are always pointing out how they had been happy with the service they received from the firm, Fred Robertson and the staff.

Furthermore I have been very happy with the cooperation I have received from DATS as a result of my taking over clients’ affairs and writing to DATS for information.

I wish the staff all the best as they embark on the next phase of their professional career.

 

What if you were involved in BMST?

You now find yourself about to be without an accountant. They will not be completing your 2012/13 Tax Return or helping you settle the enquiry into your return as a result of using BMST.

We can help you with both matters, and if you so wish your ongoing tax and accounting needs.

  • We are acting for a number of BMST clients in settling their affairs, and by so doing avoiding penalties being levied.
  • I am in regular contact with the HMRC officers handling the enquiries – starting with Mike Friar and moving on to the colleagues to whom he has delegated settling the enquiries.
  • My wife Felicity Huston and I are both former HM Inspectors of Taxes and as such are perfectly positioned to help you in your dealings with HMRC. We know what arguments to put, and when to stop arguing!
  • Some clients have been in the UK under 91 days per tax year, and for them we can reduce the BMST tax bill by use of our non-residency expertise – we have hundreds of UK clients abroad.
  • We do not use exciting tax avoidance schemes, instead relying on the sensible use of the tax law we have- aim being that clients pay the minimum tax permissible under the law.
  • You do not need to worry about the 30 October 2013 Tax Return deadline. Since we use online filing software we can file your 2012/13 return up to 30 November 2013.
  • You DO however need someone to contact HMRC on your behalf before the end of November 2013. This needs done by us, you, or someone, to ensure that you can avail of the HMRC offer to settle matters without penalties.
  • The settlement with HMRC may well extend beyond November, but that is fine so long as they know you have been in touch.

 

What if you were not involved in this, but are a client of this firm as it closes in October 2013?

We are a full service accountancy practice, and act for limited companies, sole traders and partnerships. We can set up a limited company or LLP for you, and we have special expertise in the area of non-residency.

Distance is not a problem – if we work with a client in Kabul or South Sudan on a satellite phone, then working for you via email, phone and Skype will be quite smooth.

 

Contact:

Adrian Huston on +44(0)28 9080 6080    Email IRAQ@Huston.co.uk   Skype:  Offshore.Tax

 

Further reading 

On BMST – http://www.huston.co.uk/blog/191-hmrc-sets-bmst-deadline-of-30-nov-2013-tax-avoidance.html

Video on BMST – http://youtu.be/q2_MpwCCFO0

Feel free to check out Adrian Huston’s LinkedIn profile.

 

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm (non-residency specialists) Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or 028 9080 6080.

Child Benefit tax chaos – your guide

CHILD BENEFIT – SPECIAL OFFER: For a special flat fee of £149 (including VAT) we will register you with HMRC and complete the 2012/13 Tax Return for you.  We cannot guarantee meeting the 31 Jan 2014 deadline after 10 Jan 2014.  This special offer only applies if Child Benefit is the ONLY reason you need to submit a Self Assessment Return. Call 028 9080 6080 or email mail@huston.co.uk 

Child Benefit Chaos – a guide

Child Benefit has changed for over a million people.

As of 6 October 2013 some 165,000 people had missed an important deadline to tell HMRC they were affected by the new rules.  Are you one?

Did you cancel your Child Benefit by 6 January 2013? If you still got child benefit after 6 January 2013, have you filed your 2012/13 Tax Return?

How do you sort this mess out?  Read on…

Does this affect me?

  1. Did you or your other half get child benefit after 6 January 2013? YES / NO
  2. Does one of you earn over £50,000 in taxable income per year? YES / NO
  3. Are both parties UK resident for tax purposes?  YES / NO

If you answer YES to all three then 5 October 2013 was an important date.

VIDEO on this – http://youtu.be/D3R694xhu98

Non-residents escape the charge!

If the only party with income over £50,000 is non-resident for tax purposes – as many of our clients are – there is NO obligation to register for Self Assessment or to repay any of the Child Benefit.  We have had this specific point confirmed January 2014 by HMRC.

What needed done by 6 January 2013?

If, due to one of you earning over £50,000, you are affected you should have done one of the following:

  • Cancelled the Child Benefit claim to stop the new rules making life complicated, or
  • Decided that you, the higher earner, will complete a Tax Return each year that the household gets Child Benefit. This means you must have noted that the onus is on you to register with HMRC so they know to send you a Tax Return in April 2013.

If one of you earns over £50K and you DIDN’T cancel the Child Benefit by 6 January 2013 then, unfortunately, the high earner MUST complete a 2012/13 Tax Return.  This applies even if you cancelled the benefit in mid-January, ie. just a week or two late.  Though at least by doing so there would be less Child Benefit clawed back.

What needed done by 5 October 2013?

If you are the higher earner, earned over £50K in 2012/13 and the houshold got child benefit after 6 January 2013 then you need to file a Tax Return.  Unless you already file one every year you need to register with HMRC.  This should have been done by 5 October 2013.  There is the chance of penalties for late registration, so don’t sit on your hands any longer – don’t make the situation worse.

If you have a UTR (Unique Taxpayer Reference) from filing a Tax Return anytime since 1996, then it’s not too late.  You can still file a Tax Return using that.  However it must be filed online.  Your choise there is to pay an accountant to file online (they have all the right codes) or to enrol for online filing.  This is not a quick process, as you need to be posted an ‘activation code’.

So, in simple terms, what’s this all about?

To reduce government spending (by some £2 Billion) the Chancellor has decided better-off families should not have the advantage of Child Benefit.  To achieve this he decided, in conjunction with HMRC, that the easiest way was to hit households where one party earns £50,000.

If one party earns over £60K then, in the end, all the advantage of having child benefit will be lost.  Between £50K and £60K the advantage is gradually taken away.

The problem is that not even HMRC knows all the people who are affected by this.  They don’t know all your sources of income unless you already fill in an annual Self Assessment Return. Also for some people they will not have an up-to-date address.  So of the 1.2 million people they wanted to write to about this big change, some 300,000 people were not contacted.

But it isn’t fair!

Correct!  Nobody is claiming it is fair.  It is a very blunt instrument designed to take the advantage of child benefit away from better-off families.

The main unfairness arises with looking only at individual income, not the combined income of the couple.

Example of the unfairness:

Say Ms Jones earns £60,000 then she and her non-working partner will not gain from continuing to receive Child Benefit. Indeed she may have to fill in a Tax Return each year – an added hassle.

Say her neighbours Mr & Mrs Smith each earn £30,000 then their Child Benefit claim is unaffected and they have no tax worries.

So despite the same household income, one couple loses out big time.

There is nothing to be achieved thinking about the unfairness of this system, just work out if you are affected and do what you need to do. (Write to your MP if you want the system changed.)

My income is over £50,000 – what happens?

Unless you asked to have your Child Benefit cancelled, nothing will have changed about the payments.

You have however got a tax problem. Unfortunately all Child Benefit earned from 7 January 2013 becomes taxable – at a rate from 0% up to 100%.  The rate rises according to your income. 0% at £50K up gradually to £100% if your income is £60K or above. So if your income was exactly £55,000 you would have to pay HMRC half of the child benefit earned after 6 January 2013 up to 5 April 2013.

How does HMRC get the Child Benefit back?

Important – it is up to you to register with HMRC for Self Assessment using form SA1.  That is the only way they will know to send you a Tax Return.  Only by completing that Return will they get from you that part of the Child Benefit which the government wants back.

You needed to register by 5 October 2013, though if you missed the dealine just do it today.  You can download the SA1 form at www.hmrc.gov.uk/SA1  Another way to register for Self Assessment is to fill in the HMRC online form here

Failure to register with HMRC leaves you liable to a penalty.

What income counts?

All income which is taxable, so that is the total of:

  • Pay from jobs (P60 figure if you get one)
  • Benefits in Kind from jobs (like company car, private medical cover)
  • Taxable profits from a business
  • Dividends
  • Bank interest
  • Taxable rents from letting out property
  • Income not taxable in the UK (say if you work overseas full-time) DOES NOT COUNT

What if we can’t be sure if one of us will earn over £50,000?

This will be common for people who are self-employed, or whose overtime or bonuses vary each year.

In this case you should continue to take the Child Benefit.  If, at the end of the tax year, you discover one of you has income over £50K, then you need to register for Self Assessment and fill in a Return.  If your income is below then you are in the clear for that year.  You still need to check each year.

I already complete a Self Assessment Return each year. What do I do?

For you things are simpler.  If you know your come will consistently be over £60K then you might as well just stop your Child Benefit claim.

Otherwise just continue claiming it.

If, once the year is over, you know your taxable income exceeds £50K then you must put the Child Benefit figure into the relevant box on your Tax Return – or ask your accountant to do it.

For the 2012/13 year only put the benefit received from 7 January 2013 to 5 April 2013.  Enter it in Box 1 on page 5.  In future years you declare the full year’s Child Benefit.

How much Child Benefit do I put in the form?

The amount you have to declare for 2012/13 is only what you received from 7 January 2013 to 5 April 2013.  I will help you here and tell you what the numbers are:

  • £263 for 1 child
  • £438 for 2 children
  • £612 for 3 children

How much of this is repayable will depend on how much your income exceeds £50,000 on the way to £60,000.  For example at £51,000 you have to repay 10%, £52,000 20%, and so on.  This is payable on 31 January 2014. 

What if I just ignore things?

HMRC may or may not already have you in their sights.  They should know your household gets child benefit. If they know, or find out later, that your income when all added together, exceeds £50,000 they will contact you.  By that stage they can charge you a penalty for ignoring your responsibilities.  Ignorance is not accepted as an excuse.  The penalty will be in the range 0% right up to 100%.  You will get charged a lower penalty, or maybe none at all, if you tell HMRC (late) before they get in touch with you.

Further reading on HMRC site:

More on this subject  www.hmrc.gov.uk/childbenefitcharge

To stop your Child Benefit www.hmrc.gov.uk/stopchbpayments  Note that stopping after 7 January 2013 was too late to get out of the need to file a 2012/13 Tax Return.

Estimate how much you will be charged on your Child Benefit https://www.gov.uk/child-benefit-tax-calculator

HMRC’s Child Benefit Helpline is 0845 302 1444.

MY VIDEO on this – http://youtu.be/D3R694xhu98

Note the person to fill in the Stop Child Benefit online form, or phone to have it stopped, must be the person who receives the Benefit.  Even if it is their other half who is the high earner.

If you might be affected don’t dig your head in the sand.  Failure to understand things now will only cause you headaches in the future.

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or 028 9080 6080.

PS: If you or your partner earn over £50,000 per year, and one of you gets child benefit, these new rules affect you.

If you failed to stop the child benefit by midnight Sunday 6 January 2013 then you NEEDED TO register by 5 October 2013 to complete a Self Assessment Return for 2012/13.

SPECIAL OFFER: For a special flat fee of £149 (including VAT) we will register you with HMRC and complete the 2012/13 Tax Return for you.  This only applies if Child Benefit is the ONLY reason you need to submit a Self Assessment Return. The fee is payable before we register you with HMRC.  If you have registered yourself, the offer still applies.  The fee is payable up-front, that is when you ask us to do the Return for you.

Call 028 9080 6080 or email mail@huston.co.uk

Holiday homes abroad – tax and letting issues

Many people go on holiday and then think “Wouldn’t it be lovely to own a place here?”

Some of those people will go the next step and purchase somewhere as a holiday home. Since it will be vacant much of the year it can make sense to let it out as a holiday home. What people sometimes ignore is that this has tax consequences both in the UK and often in the country the property is.

Tax myths

First I will dispel a few myths about overseas holiday homes. The right way of it is:

  • You must declare any overseas rents to the UK HMRC.
  • The tax authorities in the host country ARE interested in tax on rents there.
  • The property remains part of your Inheritance Tax estate.
  • You have to pay UK CGT if you sell.
  • You cannot reinvest in another property and avoid CGT.

That may have left a few of you somewhat shell-shocked and depressed.  Better that you learn it from me than in a letter from the tax-man – whether the tax-man is in the UK or overseas.

UK tax

If you are a UK resident for tax purposes then your worldwide income is to be declared to HMRC.  That includes rents from overseas property – even though you may feel you make no money at it.  The rents must be declared but relief can be claimed for expenses appropriate to the rent – like a sensible proportion of mortgage interest, maintenance fees, heat and utility charges. Note I said a PROPORTION of the running costs. If you also use the property for family and friends you cannot claim a year’s expenses against the rent you receive from part of a year’s rent.

Also you can claim any managing agent fees and indeed the accountant’s fee back home for showing the rents on your Tax Return.

Tax abroad

If you rent out a property in a foreign land then almost certainly the tax authorities in that country will want to know.  You should check this out.  Internet research can be helpful – though not guaranteed accurate – or you can check out the many books on buying homes abroad.  If you have a local letting agent they can help too. Bear in mind that tax authorities share information across the borders more and more these days.

If you do make a declaration to the local tax people be sure to show the paperwork to your UK accountant.  If you pay some tax overseas on the rents then you will probably get some tax relief in the UK as a result.

Inheritance tax

Just because the property is outside the UK it still counts as yours for Inheritance Tax purposes.  It can be quite difficult to escape UK Inheritance Tax even by moving overseas, often requiring severing your ownership of links to the UK such as property here etc.  If you live here then you are almost always caught for IHT on your assets anywhere in the World.

Capital Gains Tax

As a UK tax resident you will have to account for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) if you sell a holiday home.  There may or may not be any tax payable after the calculation is done.  So long as the proceeds exceed £43,600 (2013/14 year) then you will have to complete Capital Gains pages on a Self Assessment Return – even if you normally are not sent a Return. This applies even if in the end there is no tax due to be paid.

To the extent that your gains exceed £10,900 (2013/14 rates) then there will be CGT to pay.  If the property is held by two people then gains for the year could be £21,800 before tax is payable.

Reinvesting in property

Contrary to popular belief you cannot reinvest the proceeds from selling a house into buying another and so avoid a Tax Return or bill. (That type of relief applies to certain business assets only).  If you sell your Spanish home for a £30,000 profit then you have to pay tax on it – even if the entire proceeds were spent on another overseas property.

Huston’s Hints

Having the overseas property in joint names will often reduce the CGT on its eventual sale.

Keep records and receipts for capital expenditure on the property – such as putting in a pool, building a garage, installing aircon etc.  These will reduce the eventual CGT bill. 

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or 028 9080 6080. Huston & Co specialises in UK clients with income overseas.

Taking tax to the High Seas as a cruise ship lecturer

May 2013 marked a new experience for my tax career – going on a lecture tour, talking tax, but on a cruise ship. On 31 August 2013 David Frost died on the cruise ship Queen Elizabeth which he was on as a guest lecturer. I suppose if I were to die suddenly, on a cruise might be as good a place as many.

Why cruise ship lecturing?

By way of background, for many years some clients and friends had been suggesting my speaking style, and ability to make tax a little easier understood, could have another use.  They suggested I go on cruise ships as a guest lecturer.  And for many years I did nothing about it.  Then in 2012 I decided to fire up the search engine.  Within a few minutes I was on the phone to the leading agency providing cruise ship speakers for the top cruise lines.

Next stage in the process was to fly to England and give a 45 minute talk.  The agency is very protective of its reputation with the cruise lines, so won’t take anyone onto its books without having seen them present a lecture in person.

Preparing for the lecture meant doing a PowerPoint presentation, normally something I avoid in case of technical hitches.  However the presentation was prepared and the flight booked. Once I arrived at the agency I was able to see other prospective lecturers giving their demo, before my turn came.  I think I was the first person they had seen who was planning lecturing on tax, tax avoidance and finance.  The agency saw that this could be a subject of great interest to cruise passengers.  They took me onto their books for the 2013 year. (Most bookings are arranged the previous summer so summer 2013 books the speakers for 2014.)

Having suggested parts of the World I was interested in I was given one of my chosen cruises – Fred. Olsen to Norway, May 2013.

Jumping forward to May 2013 and my wife Felicity was unable to accompany me due to Patrick our son doing his AS exams.  So our older son Alex stepped in.  He was on a gap year before studying Politics at University of Nottingham from September 2013.

Arrival at the ship – MS Balmoral

Our cruise was on Fred. Olsen’s largest ship – MS Balmoral.  Still not large compared with some ships these days, it takes 1,350 passengers and has a crew of 510.  For the ship enthusiasts out there, it has a tonnage of 43,537. (I was surprised how many passengers would compare the tonnage of the ships they had been on!)

Checking in it a civilised experience compared with flying on a holiday.  Firstly you dump your bags at one place and then park up or have your taxi bring you to the passenger entrance.  Secondly you have a baggage allowance of 90Kg! Useful to pack those clothes a size bigger – for the second half of the journey. Finally you go though airport-style security scanners and check in with the cruise line staff.  They check your passport and give you the personalised card used for going on and off ship, and for charging things to your cabin.

There is no passport control. Indeed that was the last time I used my passport. It stayed in my room safe.  On arrival at port you didn’t need your passport to go ashore.

A first cruise experience?

This was my first proper cruise.  Way back around 1979 I had sailed on SS Uganda to Madeira and the Canaries, but since that was a school cruise in large windowless dormitories it barely counts as a cruise.  When I told my wife we ate off those metal trays with compartments for each course I think she thought I was on a prison ship.

The Fred Olsen 2013 experience could not have been more different. The ship was very comfortable and had lots of places to lounge around – whether on deck or inside. Wi-Fi could be purchased and accessed in various locations, and there was a peaceful library with a respectable range of books and picture windows to look out.

This was school term-time so Alex and I were certainly younger than most of the passengers.  The vast majority have retired, in some cases early retirement.  The company was great.  As well as chatting with other passengers we made friends with the entertainers and dancers on board (well as far as dancers I left that to Alex!)  Drinks on board were UK bar prices – with a pint costing about £3.20 and a measure of spirits under £3. A bottle of wine was from about £15 and the staff were very happy to keep your bottle over to finish at the next meal.

The staff – mainly from the Philippines – could not have been nicer.  They were very friendly and a few would remember our names and our favourite drinks.

I can see now why lots of people, having been nervous of cruising, try it and then become hooked. Unpack once. Sail by night, and arrive somewhere new every few days. No packing, no passport queues, so easy.

Norway and Norway Day on Oslo (17 May)

Norway day was the highlight. Lots of schools processing in a parade, and all the locals out in their best outfits to watch.  Teenage boys in three piece suits with ties, girls in the season’s latest outfit.  Lots of people in national dress.  If you get a chance to visit Oslo on Norway National Day – grab it with both hands. (A brief video from my phone is on YouTube HustonTV – see it here.)

Norway is a beautiful country with a very high standard of living.  Sailing up the fjords was breath-taking. Wonderful for photographers.

The prices were eye-watering. Plate of fish and veg in a pleasant restaurant £25.  Pint of beer £8. Two coffees and two scones £13.  Little wonder a lot of people nipped back to the ship for lunch!

The tax lectures

There were only two guest lecturers on the ship – with very different subject areas.  The 45 minute lectures were done in the large theatre used for nightly shows – so a stage with about 500 seats on three sides. The speakers wear a cordless mike making them feel like a pop star.  For me this was useful as I prefer to walk around the stage rather than stand still at a lecturn.

As the cruise went on the attendance at my lectures increased considerably, peaking at about 200.  The most popular lecture was the one on HMRC’s prosecutions of the famous and the less famous. 

People also enjoyed my tongue-in-cheek video called “Tax evasion for pets – the Harry Redknapp System” – featuring Kim the tax-fiddling collie. View it at http://youtu.be/mysNp0X52kU

After each lecture there was a trail of people following me out to ask questions and seek further nuggets of advice.  It was interesting to see the range of things people were concerned about.

The future

As both of us enjoyed the cruise this is certainly something I will be repeating – hopefully next time with my wife.  Now we have the arduous task of sitting down to examine the various cruise lines – to come up with suggested places I would next like to visit in 2014. Cruises depart from various UK cities including Belfast.  Then for 2015 I will try to find a cruise that son Patrick can come on when it’s his turn for a gap year.

£10 per day to HMRC for late Return penalties?

Tax Return fines – how does £10 per day sound?

George Osborne has his calculator out. 500,000 people who are yet to file their 2011/12 Tax Return. From Wednesday 1 May 2013 they will start getting hit with penalties of £10 per day! Yes – per day. Well the Coalition needs to get money from somewhere.

Are you one of them? If so you need to act quickly to file your Return online. If you can’t face it then have someone help you.

By the way don’t make the mistake of filing a paper return. The deadline to do that was 31 October 2012. Filing on paper now means you leave yourself liable to £900 in daily penalties.

Let me explain.

  • Miss a filing deadline and there is a £100 fine.
  • File your return more than 3 months after the deadline and you are liable to £10 per day in flat penalties. That’s for every day over the 3 months.
  • The deadline for paper filing was 31 October 2012, so 3 months late meant 31 January 2013.
  • File a paper form after 30 April 2013 and you are a full 6 months late leaving you 90 x £10 in penalties.
  • On the other hand the deadline for online filing was 31 January 2013 so 3 months late means 30 April 2013.
  • File the 2011/12 return online on 1 May 2013 and you are liable to one daily penalty of £10. Procrastinate until 30 May and the fines are 30 x £10 = £300, and so on up to £900.

 

In the old days many of these Self Assessment penalties would go away once you filed your Return and there was no tax actually due. No more.

Now if you get hit with these penalties they stick – even if in the end you have no tax bill. So move Heaven and Earth to get that 2011/12 Tax Return filed soon – very soon.

If you don’t have (or cannot find) the User ID and password needed to file online, we have software which will let us do it for you – within a day or two.

 

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or 028 9080 6080.

Close Protection abroad – UK HMRC tax-free status – rules change April 2013

I am a former Tax Inspector, also ex RMP (TA) and Police Authority Northern Ireland. I now sort out non-residency for hundreds of guys from the UK deployed abroad. Check me out on Linkedin at http://uk.linkedin.com/in/adrianhuston

New rules from April 2013. There is intended to be new legislation for 2013/14 bringing in a new Statutory Residence Test. In the past residency has been assessed using some HMRC booklets and was not actually enshrined in law. This changes things and in my view for the better.

For most of the people for whom I work this is a genuine improvement because if working abroad full-time there will be no more lingering concerns about whether the person has substantial ties to the UK. It ceases to be a concern if you have been deemed ‘automatically non-resident.

The law will not be passed until after the March 2013 budget, but just last month HMRC published its ‘Guidance Note: Statutory Residence Test (SRT)’ on how it plans for the law to work , unless Parliament interferes before Royal Assent, which is unlikely. It is at
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget-updates/11dec12/stat-res-test-note.pdf

For most UK guys in CP around the World they qualify as non-resident (automatically overseas) under the third test on page 5 as follows:

Third automatic overseas test
11. You work full-time overseas for the tax year without any significant breaks from that overseas work, and:
• you spend fewer than 91 days, excluding deemed days, in the UK in the tax year, and

• the number of days in the tax year on which you work for more than three hours in the UK is fewer than 31.

The full-time overseas part of the test does not apply to you if you are an international transportation worker.

I claim credit for changing HMRC’s policy by one day – to the advantage of members of this Group! See the ‘fewer than 91’ above. That’s how the old rules talked.

When HMRC launched its consultation
(http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/consult_statutory_residence_test.htm see page 12)
they said non-residence if fewer than 90. In my formal consultation response I pointed out that this was a pointless loss of one day. It moved away from the long-held understanding of the importance of 90 UK days being allowed to make it 89. I am therefore delighted to see that the HMRC December 2012 draft has corrected the matter. It is expected to be mentioned in the UK Budget March 2013 and then go into law for 2013/14.

Note the old averaging rules are gone – so from 6 April 2013 make sure your UK days are always fewer than 91.

So, in summary, if you work full-time abroad on CP work (or non-CP work indeed), your work extends over 2 x 6 Aprils, and your UK days are 90 or fewer per full tax year, then the April 2013 rules are not scary for you.

You will still have to complete the necessary paperwork or have someone help you, record your UK days and – very important – keep records and proof of leave spent outside the UK.

Stay safe, and keep your tax affairs safe too.

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or +44 (0)28 9080 6080    Skype Adrianhuston

HMRC names and shames tax fiddlers for first time – who and why?

History was made today 21 February 2013.  HMRC published its first ever list of people who have fiddled their taxes but not been prosecuted.  Up to now if you were caught fiddling then in over 99% of cases HMRC just took a lot of money off you – and your secret was safe.  Only HMRC, your accountant and you would know. Only a tiny number of people are taken to court each year.

The gloves are off now and HMRC today used its new law for the first time.  They held back on spoiling Valentines Day last week!

HMRC hopes that by naming and shaming tax-fiddling businesses, some of which might be in your town, people will be encouraged to be more careful to declare all that they earn.  By the way when I say fiddling I am also referring to people who have failed in their tax obligations, and as a result HMRC did not get its tax when it should, and as a result HMRC charged penalties.

I will give a link to the list shortly, but firstly I want to set out the ground rules, and explain why the list will get much longer each quarter that it is published.  The ground rules:

  • The tax has to be paid late as a result of failing to declare it, or understating one’s income
  • The inaccuracy or failure must be for a period after 31 March 2010. (For individuals this mainly means the 2010/11 or 2011/12 tax years).
  • The offence can relate to income tax, Capital Gains Tax, corporation tax or VAT.
  • This one’s important – even when coming clean to HMRC the person still did not make a FULL disclosure.  In other words they were silly enough to continue to play cat-and-mouse with the tax-man.
  • If HMRC had not found out about the problem, the loss of tax would have been at least £25,000.  Note this must all be after 31 March 2010.
  • The law states that once the name and shame details have been published for 12 months the publication must cease.

The inaugural list 21 Feb 2013 of significant tax defaulters can be read at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/defaulters/defaulters-list.pdf

What should you be aware of when reading this list?

  1. Firstly the list shows the name and address, at the time of the offences, plus the tax which wasn’t declared on time, plus the penalty levied. It shows the period after 31 March 2010 for which the penalties applied.
  2. Secondly when you add up the tax and the penalty you will know some of what HMRC needed paid, but you may not have the whole picture.  For example there may be interest added as the tax is paid late.
  1. Much more significantly – the traders may owe an awful lot more.  This is because HMRC can only tell us about the tax owed after 31 March 2010.  Most tax investigations go back a number of years – even up to 20 years.  Just because HMRC says they owed £30,000 and paid a £15,000 penalty doesn’t mean that’s the lot.  The trader might owe tax from 1992 to 2012 of £500,000, of which only £30,000 relates to the last year or two.

Why do I say the list is going to get longer every quarter a new one is published?

Even though names only stay on the list for 12 months, I know the list will get longer as the years go by.

At the moment HMRC can only publish where £25,000 of tax would have been lost since 1 April 2010 – less than three years.  Think forward two years to May 2015.  By then HMRC can name and shame you if you owe £25,000 in tax over a 5 year period. So the bar is getting lower every year.

£25,000 in 5 years – is that a lot?  Well if you pay tax at 40% and you failed to declare £20,000pa of your income then the tax and National Insurance would be at least £5,000 per year. So if caught in May 2015 you could find your name address and tax amounts published.

Do you think the local papers might run a wee story about the tax defaulters in their area?  You bet they will!

What lessons can we draw from HMRC naming and shaming tax defaulters?

If you yourself are fiddling – then if you stop now then chances are your tax after March 2010 will never exceed £25,000.  So even if you are caught, or come clean, your name will not be published.

If you go forward to HMRC to admit something – or HMRC catches you – then tell them the whole story.  Don’t hold back or fail to admit to some assets or bank accounts.  If you do the local press may come sniffing!

If you have something to confess to HMRC, or if they are onto you, seek tax specialist help NOW. We often take on cases from the regular accountant, settle the tax investigation, then hand the case back to the accountant for ongoing normal accounts work.

I have already had to advise some of our tax investigation cases about the naming and shaming rules, and consider whether our client stands to have their name publicised.

Contacting Adrian Huston:

As a potential client – call 028 9080 6080 – outside office hours 9-1 and 2-5 there is a voicemail.

Media and interview requests – in office hours call 028 9080 6080, outside office hours media can contact Adrian here:

http://www.huston.co.uk/media-contact.html?sTask=message&r_id=1439957649&task=display&pf=4

Tax refund email scam alert, not from HMRC

It’s the phishing season again.  Since lots of people filed their tax returns in recent weeks, the criminal fraternity is out to benefit.  They are sending out emails suggesting people are due refunds.

Should you read no further, get this – HMRC NEVER EMAILS TO SAY YOU ARE DUE A TAX REFUND.

Read on if you want some background.

We all see these emails which purport to come from our bank and to alert us to something.  It’s great when we know we don’t have an account with that bank – we know it’s fake.  The situation is less clear where the supposed sender is your own bank, or some ‘trusted’ organisation like HMRC.

What these people want to do is have you read the email and click on some link.  Therein lies the problem.  Click on the link and you might be downloading something nasty to your computer.  It might start telling someone what keys you press (hence revealing your passwords and indeed all correspondence). This is called key-logging. 

The other thing the email will try to trick you into doing is entering your security details or bank / card details.  The surprising thing then is that rather than nice stuff happening, you find your bank account has been cleared out, or charges put on your card.

So what’s the tax angle on all of this?

At various times of the year, but especially in February and March, emails arrive saying they are from HMRC.  They can have convincing email addresses, HMRC logo, all the right colours etc.  These generally say that having reviewed your tax affairs you are eligible for a tax rebate.  Sometimes they talk about your ‘fiscal activity’ – not even the most nerdish civil servant would use such a phrase.  They invite you to click a link and/or download a form to process your rebate.  They will also say exactly how much you are due.  Bit like PPI texts – putting an amount of money in the email makes the thing seem attractive.

I received one of these emails this week and it was better than many at trying to trick me.  It quoted what looked like a legit HMRC email – I won’t give the address the oxygen of publicity!  It was even signed off by a named member of staff, with a Western sounding name.  My email did however have some clues:

  • The day was spelled incorrectly
  • I know that HMRC email addresses (used only by the chosen few) have .gsi in them
  • It talked about ‘fiscal activity’
  • It quoted a rebate number which was not my tax ref
  • The amount was shown as J123.45 rather than £123.45, and, most importantly,
  • I know that HMRC never emails about refunds. 

By the way I predict these fraudsters might move onto threatening emails about tax bills.  Again I stress HMRC will not email you about a tax demand.  Only if your specific tax debts are the subject of ongoing correspondence might a named HMRC officer give you their email address.  Then it would be OK to use email, but this would be extremely rare.  Correspondence about tax debts will come by post. (Or in person if you are really naughty!)

ACTION PLAN

  • If you receive one of these emails then forward it to HMRC (who are daily closing these things down). Simply forward the email to phishing@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk
  • If you have received an email and may have entered personal details like User ID, national insurance details or tax reference then you must contact a different part of HMRC at security.custcon@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk
  • If you have supplied bank details for your ‘refund’ then contact the bank asap.

So in summary:

  1. HMRC never ever emails about tax refunds.
  2. HMRC will not email you about tax debts.
  3. If you get such an email report it as above.
  4. Never click on a link in an email supposedly from HMRC about your tax position.

Adrian Huston, a former tax inspector, is a director of Belfast tax and accountancy firm Huston & Co – www.huston.co.uk or 028 9080 6080.